Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
About Mr Klitzke
- Mr. Klitzke
- Mr. Klitzke is a social studies teacher at Kimberly High School.
Search This Blog
Favorite Books
- Watchmen ~Alan Moore & Dave Gibbons
- Earth Abides ~George R. Stewart
- Night ~Elie Wiesel
- Angela's Ashes ~Frank McCourt
- Maus ~Art Spiegelman
- Mutiny on the Bounty (Trilogy) ~Hall and Nordhoff
- Mrs. Frisby and the rats of N.I.M.H. ~Robert C. O'Brien
- Of Mice and Men ~John Steinbeck
- The Last of the Mohicans ~James Fenimore Cooper
- The Last Apprentice~ Joseph Delaney
- Lord of the Rings ~JR Tolkein
- The Dark Towers ~Stephen King
Favorite Movies
- Band of Brothers
- Braveheart
- Cool Hand Luke
- Dances With Wolves
- Good Will Hunting
- Goodfellas
- Lord of the Rings
- Reservoir Dogs
- Shaun of the Dead
- The Crow
- The Princess Bride
- The Quiet Man
- The Shawshank Redemption
- Unforgiven
Digital Video
Mrs. Landingham has been the President's secretary for a long time. In fact, he first met her when he was in high school and she was his father's secretary
ReplyDeleteWhat is your opinion of Josh & Donna's relationship?
ReplyDeleteWhat do you think of this conversation between the President and the retiring Supreme Court justice?
ReplyDeleteDanny (a reporter) has been asking C.J. (the Press Secretary) out for the past several months
ReplyDeleteI think he is very cranky and bitter
ReplyDeleteDylan
It seems the Supreme Court justice feels he has a lot more authority than the president.
ReplyDeletethey seem like they really trust eachother and get work done. - Colten
ReplyDeleteI feel like the Court justice is trying to warn the president to change his ways. He wants the president to become more gutsy.-Tyler Szy.
ReplyDeleteI feel like several conversations are happening here at once.
ReplyDeleteDanny needs to pursue a different woman.
ReplyDelete-Colten (jimbo)
I'm not sure what to think of Josh and Donna. He seems somewhat wimpy, and she complains a lot. ~ Adam
ReplyDeleteIt seems that Josh is a little mean to her and argues with her constantly, but overall they have a good relationship. Otherwise she would have quit by now.
ReplyDelete~Stacey McMorrow
Their relationship is very close. They work together and trust what each other has to say.
ReplyDelete-Michelle
Danny should avoid work relationships... and he can do much better
ReplyDeleteDylan
I think that Josh takes advantage of Donna and doesn't appreciate the things she does for him.
ReplyDelete-Amber N.
While Josh and Donna may seem to argue a lot, they have a very unique relationship where they can get along well and get the job done.
ReplyDelete-cody
How does Josh take advantage of Donna that makes no sense
ReplyDeleteDylan
Most politicians tend to become more moderate than their campaign promises once they become elected, whether they campaigned as highly liberal or highly conservative. that's what the Supreme court justice was pointing out. -Jordan M
ReplyDeleteJosh is cocky. -Matthew (Fil)
ReplyDeleteam i the only one that noticed all the girls are worried about how josh treats donna , but all the guys don't even mention it or seem to care about the treatment?
ReplyDeleteBrendan
I thought the President and the Judge are both very stubborn and set in what they want. They both might have good reasons for what they want, but the conflict between the person leaving and the person appointing the replacement is interesting.
ReplyDeleteJosh and Donna work well together. She worries a lot and he is always there to calm her down. Also I think the Supreme Court Justice feels he has more power than the president because he has been around longer.
ReplyDeleteWill
Both Donna and Josh use Josh and Donna, so they have a perfect work relationship and get a lot of work don
ReplyDeleteHe takes advantage of her because when she warns him about the banging that something is going to go wrong he doesn't believe her and then the section on the ceiling comes down. She gives him warnings and he never looks at them. He complains about her.
ReplyDelete-Amber N.
A mixture of significant reactions from laughter to fear are being shown within the core staff of the White House.
ReplyDelete~~Brecken V.V.~~
I think the relationship between two White House staffers would quickly turn too political and interfere with their common goals as cabinet members for the president
ReplyDelete-Dylan
I think Josh treats Donna like his secretary, someone who should help him to be organized, he's not taking advantage of her in any way. That's her job. -Alli
ReplyDeleteSince the justice feels like he has more experience, he feels like he has the authority to tell the president what to do despite the fact it is the president's responsibility to appoint the new justice. The justice is trying prove superiority and authority to appoint his replacement. - Amy
ReplyDeletewhat I find interesting is that the President never admitted that the nominee was Harrison, but the conversation progressed as if they both already knew. Not surprising, but several conversations have happened this way.
ReplyDeleteAdam M.
Amber, I agree, but I do think that without her Josh would be lost - example: loosing memos. He needs her, even if he does complain.
ReplyDeleteThe Supreme Court Justice must have been pretty convincing because now the President is second-guessing himself.
ReplyDeleteI understand how the Justice feels. He has waited all of those years to retire at the best possible opportunity, but now the President is not responding how the Justice felt he would. That would be frustrating.
ReplyDeleteAdam
All the girls? Are you sure? Because i'm pretty sure some boys have said things about how Josh treats Donna and i also read some girl comments that don't complain about how Josh treats Donna.
ReplyDeletethis episode seems to be heating up real fast.
ReplyDelete-Colten (jimbo)
I don't necessarily disagree with the Justice wanting to help pick his replacement. After spending 30 years on the bench he should have some sort of say.
ReplyDeleteHarrison is a moderate Democrat and is an easy confirmation.
ReplyDeleteMendoza more closely reflects the Presidents views but will be a difficult (if not impossible) confirmation.
What would you do as President?
we have to turn evidence over about ourselves with our drug testing.
ReplyDeleteI find it interesting the drug "thing" can just casually come up in conversation with the president but he just drops it like its no big deal when Toby tells him not to worry about it. He literaly only cares about his nominee... -Matthew (Fil)
ReplyDeleteIf the justice is not fond of how the president may pick, as he implied during the conversation, why wouldnt he pick a different administration to retire under
ReplyDelete-Dylan
I would choose Mendoza, because I am more of a maverick and believe strongly in my convictions.
ReplyDelete~~Brecken~~
Granted Donna does deserves more respect, I think Josh has a few bigger problems to deal with before thinking of how he's treating his assistant.
ReplyDelete"we have to turn evidence over about ourselves with our drug testing. "
ReplyDeleteTrue. Check out Vernonia vs. Acton (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernonia_School_District_47J_v._Acton) to find out why.
Danny needs to give up on C.J.
ReplyDeleteIf I were president I would push for the man/woman that I thought would most represent my views in the supreme court. I would feel more obligated to fight for somebody I beleived in rather than someone I just partially liked.-Tyler Szy.
ReplyDeleteHarrison seems a little fruity, i would go with Mendoza. i also feel people need to put their names down.
ReplyDelete-colten (jimbo)
I agree with tyler's comment about the nominee.
ReplyDeletebrendan
Go for the pick that you feel best reflects your views, at worst it will not go through and you can go with your backup that will go through easily
ReplyDelete-Dylan
Mendoza becuase you have to go with what you believe in even if it is going to challenge you.
ReplyDeleteHow big of an issue is the right to privacy going to be in the near future.
ReplyDeleteI think that the more he questions his decision the more likel he is to choose the wrong candidate. He should just stick with his first choice if that's who he thinks will do the best job.
ReplyDeleteNo matter how high the challenge is, if you want the one you believe in to have the seat, then you gotta fight for it. Why choose one that doesn't go with your beliefs?
ReplyDelete~Stacey McMorrow
never second guess yourself, he must go with his original candidate and trust his first instinct. if not, you usually go back and regret your decicsion in the near future.
ReplyDelete-cody
Privacy should be a right in a typical corporate job, but when you are essentially making up the executive branch of the United States, there is no right to privacy when it comes to drug testing
ReplyDelete-Dylan
With the growing phenomenon of completely uncensored anonimity on the internet, security of the aforementioned anonimity will be incredibly significant in the coming years.
ReplyDelete~~Brecken~~
Pick the person who more closely follows your beliefs. It might be harder to get a confirmation, but that nominee will potentially be influencing extremely important decisions for centuries.
ReplyDeleteAdam
I think the right for privacy is going to be a big issue in the future. It will bring up issues such as search warrents or schools searching students lockers. People will want the right for privacy but not think of everything that will exclude for officials to search for evidence and keep a handle on citizens. - marissa
ReplyDeleteThe explosion of internet and technology will prove to be a growing issue for privacy. Regardless of firewalls, we are all at risk of our privacy being violated. - Amy
ReplyDeleteI think privacy will be a big issue and it already is in some ways. Anybody can find out information about you if you put it on the internet, like socical security numbers and credit cards.
ReplyDeletesometimes privacy is a privilage. For example with the drug testing, because you are part of the white house and you are in question you should have nothing to hide and your job can overcome what level of privacy you have.
ReplyDelete-Amber N.
Privacy is a very important issue for the future. Everyone wants privacy, which is a right guaranteed to us all. However, when it comes to such a topic as drug testing in the White House or other important problems in the White House, I believe those issues shouldn't remain completely private.
ReplyDelete-cody
I would go with the challenging canidate. If nothing else, he doesn't go through and you go back to the guy who will pass.
ReplyDeletePrivacy is one of the most important things today and will be a huge issue in the future. Everybody has a right to privacy. Choosing what things and situations they may have privacy for will be a different issue.
ReplyDelete-Michelle
i think when it comes to something illegal drugs then a simple drug test is needed.
ReplyDelete-colten (jimbo)
that reporter guy hitting on CJ is a fruitcake.
ReplyDelete-colten (jimbo)
wow... goldfish.
ReplyDeleteWho knew a goldfish could bring thgem closer together?
ReplyDeleteEverybody likes a little privacy. How far the government is able to get into that privacy is for politicians and civilians to debate.-Tyler Szy.
ReplyDeleteCivillians should have the same amount of privacy that politicians have.
ReplyDelete-Amber
I think we should have MORE privacy than politicians.
ReplyDeleteIf there isn't a line drawn between privacy and where the government can go, then eventually everything will be regulated and reviewed by the government like in V for Vendetta.
ReplyDeleteb
Privacy on the internet can't get much higher. People know the little privacy they have on the internet and yet they choose to post things they shouldn't post. Why should we have more privacy than politician?
ReplyDelete-Amber
Politicians are elected to represent the people. Consequentially the people should have the right to know what narcotics are or are not affecting the decisions made to represent them in government
ReplyDelete-Dylan
No matter what, there needs to be a line that the government can not cross in the case of privacy. If there is no line, everyone will tend to feel violated by the gov't and anyone else who they feel is getting in on their private life. In all situations, we need privacy.
ReplyDelete-cody
I agree Amber. People are informed about their privacy on the internet yet they still say, do, and put whatever they want on them.
ReplyDeleteMichelle
Privacy. It's a right.
ReplyDeleteThe issue of privacy can be debated because of different situations. For example the drug situation. Or is it ok to wave privacy when someones safety is at risk?
ReplyDelete-Colten (jimbo)
like Sam said, privacy is not a right.
ReplyDeleteGood conversation...byah
ReplyDelete-Colten (jimbo)
PRO Gold Lettering Fashion
ReplyDeleteJerseys, New York Giants Jerseys, Buffalo Bills
Jerseys, cheap sale
jerseys, St.Louis Rams Jerseys, Tennessee Titans
Jerseys, nike nfl jerseys, Cincinnati Bengals
Jerseys, Washington Red Skins Jerseys, wholesale jerseys, San Diego Chargers
Jerseys, Houston Texans Jerseys,
Philadelphia Eagles
ReplyDeleteJerseys, nba
jerseys, Baltimore Ravens Jerseys, New Orleans Saints
Jerseys, Tampa Bay Buccaneers Jerseys,
http://www.sellsportjerseys.com, sellsportjerseys.com, New York Jets
Jerseys, Denver Broncos Jerseys, New England Patriots
Jerseys, San Francisco 49ers Jerseys, Green Bay Packers
Jerseys,